In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

  1. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
  2. In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care?
  3. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

I have attached topic 3 assignments.

please follow the rubrics:

 Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives with a deep understanding of the complexity of the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. 

 Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed with deep understanding of the complexity of the Christian perspective, as well as with the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. 

 How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with a deep understanding of the connection between a spiritual needs assessment and providing appropriate interventions. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses. 

 Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 

 Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

Liliane Kouame

Grand Canyon University

4/1/2020

Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

Part 1: Chart (60 points)

Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.

Medical Indications

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Patient Preferences

Autonomy

· James high blood pressure and excessive fluid buildup requires immediate dialysis

· James condition is deteriorating which makes it imperative to undergo a kidney transplant

· The medical practitioner shows respect to the parent’s decision. They choose to seek religious intervention instead of a medical intervention a decision. Irrespective of the gravity of James’ condition, the practitioner allows the parents to make an uninfluenced decision.

Quality of Life

Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

Contextual Features

Justice and Fairness

· All decisions made by both parent’s and the medical practitioner are purposed to serve James’s best interest.

· The parents offer to give one kidney to James to aid his recovery.

· All the resources in the healthcare center are dedicated to treat James’s condition.

©2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Part 2: Evaluation

Answer each of the following questions about how principles would be applied:

1. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, which of the four principles is most pressing in this case? Explain why. (45 points)

Medical practitioners are guided by strict ethical principles while practicing either research or clinical medicine. In cases of confusion health professionals can refer to the medical ethics. The ethics entail four imperative values i.e. respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Over the past years, there has been a great conflict between the medical ethics and Christian worldview. The Christian worldview stipulates a design through which Christians should explain the world. While considering this doctrine, it is imperative for a Christian individual to have an answer for the ethical questions such as “what should I do.” In this case, Mike and Joanne action should be guided by truth, their child’s future and a best course of action according to Christianity. When the position of the parents

Title

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Date

Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

Part 1: Chart (60 points)

Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.

Medical Indications

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Patient Preferences

Autonomy

· James high blood pressure and excessive fluid buildup requires immediate dialysis

· James condition is deteriorating which makes it imperative to undergo a kidney transplant

· The medical practitioner shows respect to the parent’s decision. They choose to seek religious intervention instead of a medical intervention a decision. Irrespective of the gravity of jame’s condition, the practitioner allows the parents to make an uninfluenced decision.

Quality of Life

Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

Contextual Features

Justice and Fairness

· All decisions made by both parent’s and the medical practitioner are purposed to serve James’s best interest.

· The parents offer to give one kidney to james to aid his recovery.

· All the resources in the healthcare center are dedicated to treat Jame’s condition.

©2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Part 2: Evaluation

Answer each of the following questions about how principlism would be applied:

1. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, which of the four principles is most pressing in this case? Explain why. (45 points)

Medical practitioners are guided by strict ethical principles while practicing either research or clinical medicine. In cases of confusion health professionals can refer to the medical ethics. The ethics entail four imperative values i.e. respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Over the past years, there has been a great conflict between the medical ethics and Christian worldview. The Christian worldview stipulates a design through which Christians should explain the world. While considering this doctrine, it is imperative for a Christian individual to have an answer for the ethical questions such as “what should I do.” In this case, Mike and Joanne action should be guided by truth, their child’s future and a best course of action according to Chris

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

Liliane Kouame

Grand Canyon University

4/1/2020

Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

Part 1: Chart (60 points)

Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.

Medical Indications

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Patient Preferences

Autonomy

· James high blood pressure and excessive fluid buildup requires immediate dialysis

· James condition is deteriorating which makes it imperative to undergo a kidney transplant

· The medical practitioner shows respect to the parent’s decision. They choose to seek religious intervention instead of a medical intervention a decision. Irrespective of the gravity of James’ condition, the practitioner allows the parents to make an uninfluenced decision.

Quality of Life

Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

Contextual Features

Justice and Fairness

· All decisions made by both parent’s and the medical practitioner are purposed to serve James’s best interest.

· The parents offer to give one kidney to James to aid his recovery.

· All the resources in the healthcare center are dedicated to treat James’s condition.

©2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Part 2: Evaluation

Answer each of the following questions about how principles would be applied:

1. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, which of the four principles is most pressing in this case? Explain why. (45 points)

Medical practitioners are guided by strict ethical principles while practicing either research or clinical medicine. In cases of confusion health professionals can refer to the medical ethics. The ethics entail four imperative values i.e. respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Over the past years, there has been a great conflict between the medical ethics and Christian worldview. The Christian worldview stipulates a design through which Christians should explain the world. While considering this doctrine, it is imperative for a Christian individual to have an answer for the ethical questions such as “what should I do.” In this case, Mike and Joanne action should be guided by truth, their child’s future and a best course of action according to Christianity. When the position of the parents

Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

Part 1: Chart (60 points)

Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.

Medical Indications

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Patient Preferences

Autonomy

Quality of Life

Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

Contextual Features

Justice and Fairness

©2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Part 2: Evaluation

Answer each of the following questions about how principlism would be applied:

1. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, which of the four principles is most pressing in this case? Explain why. (45 points)

2. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how might a Christian rank the priority of the four principles? Explain why. (45 points)

References: